What I liked about the reading was the importance it placed on culture as a means of communities coming together in America -- whether it was the African-Americans doing dances to their music, or the German-Americans gathering together in their beer gardens -- culture helped everyone to live and survive and feel better about themselves. However, the reading also focused on order and hierarchy -- especially with John Philip Sousa and his role as a cultural figure who embodied hierarchy and order as the head/conductor of the military band. He brought all the players into harmony through the force of his will and intellect: he knew what every instrument should be doing and when it should be doing it -- and he commanded them when to play, when to rise and fall, etc. He was the embodiment of order and control and represents for me the symbol of the power and will that is needed in order to keep the cultural ideas, meanings and nuances all working together. Without such dedication and drive it seems to me that there would not be much culture or order or any sense of hierarchy in society.Yet American culture itself was weirdly situated with...
Apparently their craft was not well appreciated. Audiences it seemed were rowdy did not appreciate the special allure that the theater held for English audiences, say, back in the day of Shakespeare. Perhaps this explains the popularity of marionette-shows -- puppet shows. But what did it all mean? As the reading later suggests, true art has to have order and boundaries so that sense can be made of it. But in a land like America, where pragmatism was valued more than aesthetics, the question of whether art really mattered was one that divided people of various sensibilities. On the one hand, what mattered was law and order, and on the other what mattered was the cathartic effect that art could deliver. The plumber shown out of the art museum because of his clothes and the public outcry that resulted (followed by the museum's defense) is one example of this conflict.
…
